validity. Objectivity is prized in scholarly rticularly in peer review. Otherwise, there may be some bias in a research. By writing scientific articles we communicate science among colleagues and peers.
Can research paper biased
North american symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial collaborators. Koshima I, Inagawa K, Urushibara K,. Oxford University Press; Oxford: 1996. The north american symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial : Surgical results in 1415 patients. Burkhardt BR, Eades. To ensure that a sample is representative of a population, sampling should be random,.e. If a study is aimed to assess the association of altered KLK6 (human Kallikrein-6) expression with a 10 year incidence of Alzheimers disease, subjects who died before the study end point might be missed from the study. Or, web articles published by educational organizations, intended to teach or inform, can be helpful, too. Quality of clinical studies in aesthetic surgery journals: A 10-year review. There is a very often"d saying (attributed to Ronald Coase, but unpublished to the best of my knowledge which says: If you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything.