persuasive essay rebuttal more than one paragraph

concerns only an aspect of your argument; if it undermines your whole case, you need a new thesis. If you manage to draft an essay without imagining a counterargument, make yourself imagine one before you revise and see if you can integrate. And in many ways, we are probably relieved that genetics does not tell us everything we need to know about ourselves. Their argument is that school choice would allow all parents the freedom, regardless of income level, to select the school that provides the best education (Chub and Moe). And, of course, the disagreeing reader doesn't need to be in your head: if, as you're starting work on an essay, you ask a few people around you what they think of topic X (or of your idea about X) and keep alert for uncongenial. Or, it might seem that. We study ourselves because we are not content simply being ourselves. We still hope that genetics is the secret of disease, if not the secret of life. Modern biology, of course, is only one avenue of self-understanding, one way of asking questions. Having such an inner conversation during the drafting stage, however, can help you settle on a case worth making.

Food and sex alone do not satiate. He makes sure the reader knows that he is outlining opposing viewpoints because he gives hints like "Supporters of school choice point out that." or "Their argument is that.".

He helps the reader see this with hints like "One of the biggest dangers of school choice." or "It is feared that.". But at some point in the process of composing an essay, you need to switch off the questioning in your head and make a case. These companies represent a growing trend of privatization of public schools by large corporations. If you come to find the counterargument truer than your thesis, consider making it your thesis and turning your original thesis into a counterargument. Acknowledge Valid Parts Activists within the school choice movement can be applauded for seeking to improve public education, but the changes they propose would in fact seriously damage public education as a whole. Best of all, it would reduce or eliminate the need for racial profiling: "Anyone who had the national ID card could be allowed to pass through airports or building security more expeditiously, and anyone who opted out could be examined much more closely" (590).

Refutation Paragraphs - Mesa Community College
How to Write a Rebuttal Essay Education - Seattle